gillpolack (gillpolack) wrote,

Women's History Month - Lucy Sussex

I’m a writer by trade and as such I deal in character and narrative—which my mother Marian’s life had in quantity. As a writer I don’t think I can do it justice, but as a daughter, I can offer you a potted version, with vignettes. In this I draw on Marian’s words—and like many older Australian women she was gifted at anecdote. She told stories of her life, and if I get them wrong, then I apologise.

Everybody is a product of their nature and nurture, time and place. From the hindsight of the 21st century, we think those born 90 years ago lived in interesting times, in the Chinese sense of a curse: 2 world wars, the depression, then the cold war. Yet my parents were part of an extraordinary generation, who were interesting, tough, adaptive people precisely because of those times.

Marian Roscoe Wilson, b. 1916 in Melbourne, to a father, Alfred, who would be a major force in Melbourne Anglican life, ending as Dean of St Paul’s Cathedral, and a mother, Florence Hearn, from a large country family, a woman of determined character. Marian is the 2nd daughter, which is very important. On the one hand it meant she couldn’t, because of gender, follow in her father’s footsteps. Had my mother been a male, she might have made a somewhat heretical Vicar. Gender also meant that she didn’t, as was the case with young men of her generation, fight in ww2, from which so many came home scarred or not at all.

Vignette 1: a young Australian woman finds herself in Salisbury, and walks to Stonehenge, in high heels. She has the monument entirely to herself. Because, on that day, ww2 is declared.

That’s very novelistic, but it’s real life, true.

She knew before then that she wanted to be an artist. But the life of art is never easy, and certainly no way to earn a living in the midst of the great depression. Vicar’s daughters do not have independent incomes. One of her art tutors told her, decades later: ‘You could have been a Grace Cossington-Smith’. It was not something about which she was bitter, not at all. She appreciated her children, and the art she belatedly did.

Instead of following her natural inclination, she excelled academically, winning a scholarship to Melbourne University. She wrote skits for Janet Clarke Hall, and loved Middle English verse, even reading it in her 90th year. She might have been a Don—or she might have been a Vicar’s wife, like her mother, for she got engaged to a Divinity student. The two occupations were probably not compatible. In any case they ceased to be options in her final degree year. Broken engagements do not make for high marks.

Vignette 2: a young woman, who is desperately unhappy, visits a Fortune teller—who tells her she will marry at 25 and never have to worry about money. Which turns out to be a perfectly accurate prediction.
More novelistic but true stuff.

Back in Melbourne, she meets Ronald Sussex at a dance and they marry. She becomes an academic wife, a hard-working and supportive sector of womanhood. It means: going anywhere the jobs are, entertaining the vice-chancellor to tea, and in the days of sabbatical leave, managing a household with children, overseas and on the road in foreign countries. I don’t know how she did it.

She had children, which she approached in a similar supportive but also creative spirit. She wanted to make something special for her first-born, my brother Roland, but it was wartime and fabric was rationed. The only fine woolen fabric she could get was khaki. So my brother ended up resplendent in khaki smocked in bright yellow and red—showing her sense of colour. Whatever we wanted to do, vocation-wise, she was there for us. Not many mothers would let a sixteen-year-old girl, my sister Polly, go to Prague to study cello. With me she corrected my grammar when I started writing, and told me my sentences were too staccato. None of this: that’s nice dear, if it plainly wasn’t. She knew when to criticize, and when to hold back.

It wasn’t until we moved to Townsville that she got what Virginia Woolf described as essential for a creative woman: a room of her own. It was a studio for her, where she worked first alone, then with a tutor, David Rainford. He told her when her art was pretty-pretty, and encouraged her to draw with strength. Only when my father retired did she achieve her ambition of going to art school: RMIT. Not many people do that at 60. She graduated, and became a printmaker, exhibiting locally and overseas.

She also did what many people think is very easy but is in fact very hard: wrote and illustrated a children’s book for her eldest granddaughter, Nicola, which was of professional standard and got published: THE MAGIC BILLY.

The unpleasant irony is that after 8 years printmaking chemicals gave her cancer of the throat. But though she gave up her printmaking, she made something positive of it. She always did that. She turned to using pastels, and a move to Brisbane opened up her palette to bright colour again. Some of the examples we can see around us now.

Last vignette. A woman artist in her 70s is invited to a church celebration in Brisbane, where her first love, an Anglican cleric, will be officiating. Also present is a famous former parishioner, now one of Australia’s best poets: Gwen Harwood. They are quite remarkably alike, these two women, and the cleric tells the poet’s biographer, who is present: ‘I loved them both!’ It is the first and only time the three corners of this old love triangle meet.
Again, another moment that is almost too novelistic to be true.

Novels are hard to end, and so are lives. My mother died on Friday the thirteenth, from the belated effects of her cancer treatment. ‘Death is the price we pay for life and for all life,’ Ursula Le Guin wrote in a book my mother loved, THE FARTHEST SHORE. She paid it peacefully.

The mind replays memories, sometimes in creative ways. As a reviewer, I don’t like ghostly visitations in dreams as a plot device. Dreams are more inevitably more about the dreamer than what they dream about. Nonetheless several nights ago I dreamt I saw Marian. She stood in a half-open doorway, an interior scene. What was in the room behind her was uncertain. She looked out from behind her big glasses, then slowly closed the door. I woke at that point, so retained the dream, and mulled over it. “In my father’s house are many mansions?”—to be Biblical. ‘A room of one’s own?’—to be feminist. In either case, an artist’s studio.

To finish, with one of the poems Marian wrote for the MSWPS newsletter, the Melbourne Society of Women Painters and Sculptors. She made light of her poems, but they do articulate the artistic beliefs behind her work. And this one is rather good:

We say we paint a flower, a face, a scene,
But that is only half of what we mean—
What of the building blocks: lines, balance, shapes,
The almost abstract—something which escapes
The passing viewer? Leonardo told
His students: Go and find a wall that’s old
And look at it. At first it’s just a wall
Weathered and stained—nothing is there at all
But trace the seams and blemishes you’ll find
Line, shape, and form, clear to the artist’s mind.

And so we see what Leonardo knew:
Nature and time
Are picture-builders too.

Link to Marian's webpage:

  • (no subject)

    Blogging has had to fade into the background recently. First I didn't have time to read blog posts and then I didn't have time to write them. Now you…

  • (no subject)

    Right now, I spend between 30 minutes and 180 minute a day, every day, answering questions, listening, chatting about subjects of concern. Mostly…

  • Just thinking

    I wrote this before I did all my travels. Given it's IWD today, it's not a bad time for pondering from my (very female) perspective. In case someone…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.